Showing posts with label Notes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Notes. Show all posts
Sunday, 20 August 2017
Wednesday, 16 August 2017
Thursday, 27 April 2017
Objective Simultaneous Equations
- By the eliminations of one or more than one variables from the given simultaneous equations, we get such a relation which is __________ of that variable.
- At least ________ equations are required for elimination of one variable.
- In elimination, both equations should have the ________ that has to eliminate.
- Eliminant or relation shows that the solution set of both equations is not _________.
- The relation free from x for x-b = 0 and x-d = 0 is ___________.
- The relation free from x for xt = s and x = t is ___________.
- The relation free from t for at = x and 2at = y is ______________.
- The relation independent of ‘x’ for equations x + 1/x = a and x2 + 1/x2 = b2 is ________.
- Te relation independent of ‘x’ for equations x + 1/x = m and x3 + 1/x3= n is __________.
- The relation free from ‘t’ for equations x + t = 3p and x – t = 4q is ____________.
- The eliminant by eliminating ‘m’ for equations m + bc = x and m – ad = y is _______.
- The eliminant by elimination y for equations y2 = s and y3 = r is ____________.
- The relation free from y for equation y = 1/2m and y = 4n is ____________.
- The equation y + 4 = 9 is y –5 =6 are not true for a __________ value of y.
- A relation independent of ‘t’ from equations t5 = d and t3 = b is ___________.
- A relation independent of ‘x’ from equations x3 – b = 0 and x2 + d = 0 is ________.
- The relation free from ‘x for equations x2 + 1 = 3m2 and x4 + 1 = n4 is __________. x2 x4
- The relation free from ‘y’ for equations √y – 1 = √a and y + 1/y = b is ___________. √y
- The relation from ‘y’ for equation x = √2 t and y = √7 t is ____________.
- The relation free from ‘x’ for equations x + a = 0 and x2 + y2 = b2 is _________.
- The eliminant by elimination ‘u’ for equations v = u –t and u2 = 2vt.
- The eliminant by eliminating ‘y’ for equations y3 + 1/y3 = m and y3 – 1/y3 = n is _______.
- The relation free from ‘x’ for equations x – 1 = m and x3 – 1 = 4n3 is _________ x x3
- The relation free from ‘x’ for equations x = 3p and x = 1 is __________ 7t
- The relation free from ‘y’ for equation y2 – 1/y2 = a and y4 + 1/y4 = b4.
Wednesday, 15 March 2017
Important points and formulae related to Percentage
Increase = new value – original
value
Decrease = original value – new value
Profit = selling price – cost price
Loss = cost price – selling price
Discount = marked price – sale price
%
Important Formulas related to a Circle
Area of circle = πr2
Perimeter of circle = circumference = 2 πr
Area of ring = πR2 – πr2
Length of arc = x0/ 360 × 2 πr
Area of sector = x0/ 360 × πr2
Perimeter of sector = length of arc + 2 radius
Area of segment = Area of sector – area of
triangle
1 revolution (in terms of angle) = 3600
1 revaluation( as a distance) =
circumference= 2 πr

Standard Form or Scientific Notation
Many
measurements involve very large numbers
Example: speed of light is 300000000
m/s.
This figures
can easily b written as:
This
way of writing a numbers is called standard form or scientific notation.
Another
example can be the wavelength of violet light which is 0.000038cm.
It
can be written as:
So
a general rule for all figure in written in standard form or scientific
notation is:
By: Sir Baqir
Tuesday, 14 March 2017
Determining Minimum & Maximum Values
Determining Minimum & Maximum Values
One
of the most important uses of calculus is determining minimum and maximum
values. This has its applications in manufacturing, finance, engineering, and a most of other industries. Before we examine a real-world example, we should
learn how to calculate such values.
Let's consider example, the equation 2X2 -5X -7 = 0
This
is a quadratic equation in one variable.
ax2 + bx +
c = 0
With equations of this type, we know that when the "a" term is positive, the graph of the curve will be "concave up" (U-Shaped) and therefore the equation will have a minimum value but no maximum value (okay - technically, the maximum value is infinity). Looking at the graph we see that the minimum point is roughly X = 1.5 and Y = -10. Is there a way to determine the minimum point without graphing the equation and getting an exact value? Yes there is !
Look at the graph. If
slope values were calculated for points on the left side of the curve,
you could see that the slope would always be negative but it becomes
"less negative" the closer the curve approaches the minimum (the
bottom). If the slope were calculated along the right side of the curve,
the value would always be positive and the slope values would get larger
the further away from the "bottom" the points were.
So, it is logical to
think that the slope is zero at that "bottom" point and
therefore the derivative is zero at that point too.
So, let's take the derivative of 2X2 -5X -7 = 0 which is:
So, let's take the derivative of 2X2 -5X -7 = 0 which is:
4X - 5
When
4X -5 equals zero, X =1.25 which means that at this point, a minimum value
exists. As for the 'Y' value, we go to the original equation and enter the
value of X as 1.25.
Y = 2X2
-5X -7
Y = 2*(1.25)2
-5*1.25 -7
Y = -10.125
So,
at point X=1.25, Y= -10.125 there exists a minimum value.
In this example we knew
that we were obtaining a minimum value because we graphed it. Also, we stated
that the "rule" for quadratic equations is such that when the 'a'
term is positive, the curve will be "concave-up". There is yet a
third method to determine whether a point is a maximum or minimum value.
If we take the second derivative and if that value is positive, then we are dealing with a minimum value.
In this example, taking the derivative of the derivative we have the value 4 which is positive and so we know this is a minimum.
If we take the second derivative and if that value is positive, then we are dealing with a minimum value.
In this example, taking the derivative of the derivative we have the value 4 which is positive and so we know this is a minimum.
For equations of the
type aX2 + bX + c =0, a handy tool to use is the Quadratic
Equation Calculator.
Not only does this calculate the roots of the equation, it will also show the
derivative and the point at which the maximum or minimum exists.
The second example we
will look at is very similar to the previous one, except that it is
"concave down" instead of "concave up".
Okay, let's examine
this equation:
-4X2 + 4X
+ 13 = 0
Since
this is a quadratic equation in one variable with the 'a' term being negative,
we know that the graph of the curve will be shaped "concave down" (shaped
like ∩) and it will have a maximum value but no minimum value (okay, if you
want to be technical, its minimum value is negative infinity. You happy now?).
We
learned from the first example that the way to calculate a maximum (or minimum)
point is to find the point at which an equation's derivative equals zero.
The derivative of this equation is:
-8X + 4
and
when -8X + 4 = 0, then X= .5 and it is at that point where the maximum of the
curve is located. As for the 'Y' value, we substitute .5 into the original
equation and get:
Y = -4*(.5*.5)2
+4*.5 + 13
Y = 14
So, at point X=.5, Y=
14 there exists a maximum value.
Taking the second derivative of -8X + 4, we get -8. Since this is negative, it means that we have found a maximum value.
Taking the second derivative of -8X + 4, we get -8. Since this is negative, it means that we have found a maximum value.
Factor Theorem
Note: Before this see Remainder Theorem
if we calculate f(c) and it was 0? which implies remainder is 0,
then (x-c) must be a factor of the polynomial!
The Factor Theorem:
When f(c)=0 then x-c is a factor of the polynomial
we can also write:
When x-c is a factor of the polynomial then f(c)=0
The factor "x-c" and the root "c" are the same thing
Example:
2x3-x2-7x+2
The polynomial is degree 3, and could be difficult to solve. So let us plot it first:
The curve crosses the x-axis at three points, and one of them might be at 2. We can check easily:
f(2) = 2(2)3-(2)2-7(2)+2 = 16-4-14+2 = 0
Yes! f(2)=0, so we have found a root and a factor.
How about where it crosses near -1.8?
f(-1.8) = 2(-1.8)3-(-1.8)2-7(-1.8)+2 = -11.664-3.24+12.6+2 = -0.304
No. (x+1.8) is not a factor.
if we calculate f(c) and it was 0? which implies remainder is 0,
then (x-c) must be a factor of the polynomial!
Example: x2-3x-4
f(4) = (4)2-3(4)-4 = 16-12-4 = 0
so (x-4) must be a factor of x2-3x-4The Factor Theorem:
When f(c)=0 then x-c is a factor of the polynomial
we can also write:
When x-c is a factor of the polynomial then f(c)=0
Why Is This Useful?
Knowing that x-c is a factor is the same as knowing that c is a root (and vice versa).The factor "x-c" and the root "c" are the same thing
Example:
2x3-x2-7x+2
The polynomial is degree 3, and could be difficult to solve. So let us plot it first:
The curve crosses the x-axis at three points, and one of them might be at 2. We can check easily:
f(2) = 2(2)3-(2)2-7(2)+2 = 16-4-14+2 = 0
Yes! f(2)=0, so we have found a root and a factor.
So (x-2) must be a factor of 2x3-x2-7x+2
How about where it crosses near -1.8?
f(-1.8) = 2(-1.8)3-(-1.8)2-7(-1.8)+2 = -11.664-3.24+12.6+2 = -0.304
No. (x+1.8) is not a factor.
Remainder Theorem
how to avoid Polynomial Long Division when
finding factors!!
"7 divided by 2 equals 3 with a remainder of
1"
Each part of the division has special names:
We can write as a sum like:
Polynomials:
Polynomial is an expression containing more than 2 algebraic terms.
We can also divide polynomials.
f(x) ÷ g(x) = q(x) with a remainder of r(x)
But it is better to write it as a sum like this:
Example:
2x2-5x-1 divided by x-3
- f(x) is 2x2-5x-1
- g(x) is x-3
After dividing we get the answer 2x+1, but there is
a remainder 2.
- q(x) is 2x+1
- r(x) is 2
we can write:
2x2-5x-1 = (x-3)(2x+1) + 2
When you divide by a polynomial of degree 1 (such as "x-3") the remainder will have degree 0.
2. The Remainder Theorem
When you divide a polynomial f(x) by x-c you get:
f(x) = (x-c)·q(x) + r(x)
But r(x) is simply the constant r (remember) when you divide by (x-
c) the remainder is a constant)
f(x) = (x-c)·q(x) + r
Now put x equal to
c:
f(c) = (0)·q(c) + r
f(c) = r
So we get this:
The Remainder Theorem:
When you divide a polynomial f(x) by x-c the remainder r will be f(c)
So if you want to know the remainder after dividing by x-c you don't need to do any division:
Just calculate f(c).
Example:
2x2-5x-1 divided by x-3
We don't need to divide by (x-3) ... just calculate f(3):
2(3)2-5(3)-1 = 2x9-5x3-1 = 18-15-1 = 2
And that is the remainder we got from our calculations above.
We didn't need to do Long Division at all!
Example:
Dividing by x-4
(Continuing our examplee)What would the remainder be if we divided by "x-4" ?
"c" is 4, so let us check f(4):
2(4)2-5(4)-1 = 2x16-5x4-1 = 32-20-1 = 11
Monday, 13 March 2017
Laws of Logs
The properties of indices can be used to show that
the following rules for logarithms are satisfied:
·
logax + logay = loga(xy)
·
logax – logay = loga(x/y)
·
logaxn = n.logax
Example
= log 3 + log 23 - log 4
= log 2 + log 8 - log 4
= log (2 × 8) - log 4
= log 16 - log 4
= log (16/4)
= log 4
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










